Poor Hollywood

Have you ever noticed that the ones usually most engaged in class warfare against the "filthy rich" are among the most wealthy in our society? When you think of the richest people, who comes to mind? For me, I think of Wall Street bankers, trial lawyers, big-name entertainers, and corporate moguls like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. But, aren't these among the most leftist people in our country - the very ones who rail most against the rich who get all those Republican-sponsored tax breaks?

Isn't it wonderful that none of these people stoops so low to take any of these breaks, but instead gives such a high percentage of their income in taxes to the Government and charitable donations to all those great organizations caring for the homeless, orphaned and otherwise down-trodden?

Right.

We've bailed out those Wall Street bankers (you know, the ones who consistently vote for Democrats), we continually make legislation and other policies that help foster more trial lawyers, and the media is all too eager to ask the opinion of Hollywood elitists (as if they had an opinion worth listening to). And, the largesse of the Bill Gates' and Warren Buffet's of this world to the poor is surpassed only by their donations to lobbyists and liberal politicians.

Maybe one day, if we're lucky, we could be wealthy enough to not care how much their leftist policies impact our wallets. We, too, could be among the "filthy rich."

Staying Power

I'm sitting here watching "Julie & Julia" (for the second time), and I'm just thinking how incredible Meryl Streep is. I still vividly remember the first time I saw her - in "The Deer Hunter." A few months ago, I watched "Mamma Mia!" for the first time. Who knew she could sing? I thought for sure the producers would have done a "Marnie Nixon" with her, but she was fantastic. (Of course, Pierce Brosnan was an odd choice - he can barely act, much less sing, and Daniel Craig has made us all but forget his go at being Bond.)

Several weeks ago, another lady was attempting a comeback of sorts - Whitney Houston. A great example of a very talented woman who, unfortunately, made some very lousy choices in her life, the worst being her choice of "husband." Hearing her sing brings tears to my eyes. Tears of sadness for what could have been - what should have been.

Julie & Julia just makes me think of Meryl & Whitney. An incredible example of the difference between making wise choices versus making self-destructive ones.

Unity in the Church

I have a vision for unity in the Body of Christ. It is not one of a single church structure incorporating all Christ-followers throughout the world, that is, it's not where all the Protestants and Catholics become Eastern Orthodox, or any other combination like that. Rather, my vision rests on a view of I Corinthians 12, where Paul illustrates the Body using, well, a body, where the hand can't say to the foot, "I don't need you," etc.

My view is that all this denominationalism and sectarianism (not sure that's the word I want) is not necessarily bad. It seems to me that each facet of the Church (Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant-in all its flavors, and others) is a member of the overall body and that ALL are a necessary part of it. Indeed, not only are they all necessary, but I believe they are all Spirit-directed and (dare I say it) "predestined." I do not believe God intended a homogeneous people who all believed the same doctrines and all practiced the same mode of worship. If that is what is meant by spiritual unity, then I see no hope that it will come in my (or anyone else's) lifetime.

A word of caution here: I am not advocating a universalist/pluralist understanding that no doctrinal positions matter. On the contrary, I believe there should be a set of beliefs (and practices) that are categorized as "essential" such that the term Christ-follower is not applied to anyone NOT believing and practicing these in their totality. Of course, the hard part is determining what these should be and how to reach consensus on them. That will certainly require the action of the Holy Spirit. Maybe He will revive those ancient "council's" again? (And, no, I don't mean the WCC!)

I believe our part in this is two-fold. First, we should acquaint ourselves with other elements of the Church different from our own - their history, their beliefs, their practices, their theology - as a means of discovering the common ground we share. Second, we should take a hard look at the differences we cling to and prayerfully weigh these against Scripture and Church history (and history in general!) to see which of these are only held out of prejudice or preference, and be willing to remove some of them from our own list of "essential" doctrines.

I believe we will find that we have far more in common with others than we presuppose; and that we will learn that many things we hold as true did not have their origins in The Truth.

More to follow...

What's in a (display) name?

"CrazyLoverWannabe." Hmmm. Sounds a bit strange, perhaps kinky. What's this about?

At the risk of choosing a lengthy display name which may easily succumb to my short-term memory loss moments, I chose this name based on the title of a book which I've started to read, Crazy Love by Francis Chan. The gist of the book is that we Christians need to be so "crazy" in love with God that we actually live like we believe all that stuff the Bible teaches. Well, I've been a Christian (so-called) for about 44 years and am still frustrated by the petty sins I carry around and by my lack of faith.

I know there is more than I am living. I know that He wants to do more with me and through me (and to me) than I've allowed Him to do so far. So, call me a crazy lover "wannabe."

I haven't barely started the book, yet I highly recommend it. There's something, well, spiritual dripping from it. For reasons I can't explain, I literally cried as I was reading the preface.

I'm looking ahead to continued reading with fear and trembling. This could be the start of something "real."

CLW